Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by whitelisting our website.
Posted inUncategorized

OpenAI’s Product Shake-Up Put the Complexifiers in Charge

Wired, back on May 15:

OpenAI says it’s folding ChatGPT, its AI coding agent Codex, and
its developer-facing API into one core product team. The company
says that Codex is increasingly powering its consumer and
enterprise offerings, which are gaining the ability to perform
digital tasks autonomously on behalf of users.

Other OpenAI leaders are also taking on larger roles at the
company as part of the changes. OpenAI’s head of Codex, Thibault
Sottiaux, has been tapped to lead the company’s core product and
platform teams. Sottiaux was a key leader in building Codex into
one of the company’s fastest-growing products of all time. He’s
also one of the leaders overseeing development of OpenAI’s
forthcoming “super app,” which aims to combine Codex, ChatGPT, and
the company’s Atlas web browser into a unified desktop
application.

I’ll give them credit for sticking with a plan for two whole months to get this out the door. But the problem is they went the wrong way. Instead of putting the eggheads from Codex in charge of ChatGPT, they should have put the product-minded people from ChatGPT in charge of Codex. Codex, I’m finally learning, is sprawling and confusing. It needs a strong dose of focus, clarity, and coherence — attributes that ChatGPT exhibited in spades. Instead, by putting the Codex dorks in charge, they’ve injected ChatGPT with confusion, incoherence, and sprawl.

Claude, the app OpenAI’s leadership is obsessed with copying now, is so goddamn confusing that it has Extensions, Plugins, Capabilities, Skills, and Connectors — and they’re all different things. You’ve let your own AI overuse turn your brain to mush if you think that makes sense, but even more so if you think that’s the model to copy.

I’ve been waiting for a while now for someone to explain all of this clearly and succinctly, worried that maybe it was my job to figure it out and do the clear succinct explaining. All of this dogshit from OpenAI and Anthropic presents itself as though it can be explained clearly and succinctly. But it’s just a veneer of coherence. It’s all just been thrown together in an AI blender and poured out as mush.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *