President Donald Trump’s executive order directing the attorney general to finalize the marijuana rescheduling process is overwhelmingly popular among cannabis consumers, according to a new poll.
The survey from the cannabis telehealth platform NuggMD asked people who use marijuana to share their perspective on the order, which was signed in December but has yet to be followed through on by Attorney General Pam Bondi. The pending plan would move cannabis from Schedule I to Schedule III of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA).
About 83 percent of respondents said they support the order, compared to 7 percent who expressed opposition and 10 percent who said they didn’t have an opinion about the proposed reform.
| Q: “Do you support or oppose the executive order to reschedule cannabis?” | ||
| n: | % | |
| Support | 379 | 82.9% |
| Oppose | 34 | 7.4% |
| No opinion | 44 | 9.6% |
| 457 | ||
NuggMD also included a follow-up question about the practical impacts of rescheduling, pointing out that while it would not federally legalize cannabis, it’s expected to “lead to more medical research into cannabis and for cannabis companies to realize the tax benefits available to most other businesses.”
About two-thirds (73 percent) of cannabis consumers said they care a “great deal” about those policy outcomes, while 22 percent said they care “some” about them and 3 percent said they care “a little bit.” Only 2 percent said they don’t care at all.
| Q: “While rescheduling is not legalization, it is expected to lead to more medical research into cannabis and for cannabis companies to realize the tax benefits available to most other businesses. To what extent do you care about those outcomes?” | ||
| n: | % | |
| A great deal | 334 | 73.4% |
| Some | 99 | 21.8% |
| A little bit | 15 | 3.3% |
| Not at all | 7 | 1.5% |
| 455 | ||
“The EO from President Trump that tells the attorney general to finish the rescheduling process in the most expeditious manner is different from the 2022 statement from President Biden that requested [the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, o HHS] begin the process,” Andrew Graham, head of communications at NuggMD, told Marijuana Moment. “I would argue that the EO has more force, if only because of how this administration seems to operate compared to the last one.”
“I don’t see an avenue for the attorney general to openly defy the president’s order while also maintaining her power and proximity to it, which is why I think rescheduling will indeed happen this year,” he said. “I know a lot of stakeholders are still trying to talk themselves into believing that this time, with rescheduling, it’s different. But I do think that perspective is appropriate, even thought it is far from a done deal and things could still go awry.”
The NuggMD survey involved interviews with 457 cannabis consumers living in legal states from January 8-28, with a +/4.58 percentage point margin of error.
Despite Trump’s call for the attorney general to complete the rescheduling process “in the most expeditious manner” more than a month ago, that has not come to fruition at this point. And a top Justice Department spokesperson told Marijuana Moment last week that they have “no comment or updates” to share on the topic.
DOJ has been notably silent on the issue in the weeks since Trump signed the order—even as the White House recently touted the president’s order as an example of a policy achievement during the first year of his second term.
Former Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL), Trump’s first pick for attorney general this term who ultimately withdrew his nomination, raised eyebrows last week after posting on X that he’s been told the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) is actively drafting a rescheduling rule and intended to issue it “ASAP.”
There’s some confusion around that point, however, as a rule is already pending before the Justice Department—and a new rule would presumably be subject to additional administrative review and public comment.
Last week, meanwhile, the White House declined to comment on the status of the rescheduling process, deferring Marijuana Moment to the Justice Department.
A Democratic senator told Marijuana Moment earlier this month that it’s “too early to tell” what the implications of Trump’s cannabis order would be—saying that while there are “things that look promising” about it, he is “very concerned about where the DOJ will land.”
“The ability of the Trump administration to speak out of both sides of their mouth is staggering,” Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) said. “So I’m just going to wait and see right now. Obviously, there’s things that look promising—to end generations of injustice. I really want to wait and see.”
—
Marijuana Moment is tracking hundreds of cannabis, psychedelics and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters pledging at least $25/month get access to our interactive maps, charts and hearing calendar so they don’t miss any developments.
Learn more about our marijuana bill tracker and become a supporter on Patreon to get access.
—
Also last month, two GOP senators filed an amendment to block the Trump administration from rescheduling cannabis, but it was not considered on the floor.
Meanwhile, last month, DEA said the cannabis rescheduling appeal process “remains pending” despite Trump’s executive order.
A recent Congressional Research Service (CRS) report discussed how DOJ could, in theory, reject the president’s directive or delay the process by restarting the scientific review into marijuana.
Bondi separately missed a congressionally mandated deadline last month to issue guidelines for easing barriers to research on Schedule I substances such as marijuana and psychedelics.
The post Marijuana Consumers Overwhelmingly Back Trump’s Rescheduling Order, Poll Shows As Advocates Await DOJ Action appeared first on Marijuana Moment.
