From the LucasFonts account, in a comment on Hacker News:
Professional typography can be achieved with both serif and
sans-serif fonts. However, Times New Roman — a typeface older
than the current president — presents unique challenges.
Originally crafted in Great Britain for newspaper printing, Times
was optimised for paper, with each letterform meticulously cut and
tested for specific sizes. In the digital era, larger size
drawings were repurposed as models, resulting in a typeface that
appears too thin and sharp when printed at high quality.Serif fonts are often perceived as more traditional, but they are
also more demanding to use effectively. While a skilled
typographer can, in theory, produce excellent results with Times,
using it in its default digital form is not considered
professional practice.
This echoes my thoughts: the State Department should use a traditional-looking serif typeface, but they should choose — or even better, commission — something far better than Times New Roman.
Also from that Hacker News thread, comes this delightful Easter egg: do a Google search for “Lucas de Groot”, and the results will be set in Calibri. Same thing for common fonts like, yes, Times New Roman.
